Legal Opinion
Schmitz v. Iowa Department of Human Services
Court of Appeals of Iowa
Decided August 30, 1990No. 89-1213PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHLEGEL, Presiding Judge.
Petitioner-appellant Patti Schmitz appeals a decision of the district court affirming a decision by the Iowa Department of Human Services (DHS) that Schmitz had been overpaid Aid to Dependent Children (ADC) benefits and ordering a reduction in benefits to recover the overpayment. Appellant argues that DHS’s decision is not supported by substantial evidence because it is grounded in a record composed solely of hearsay evidence. We agree, and therefore, reverse and remand.
Appellant and her two children receive ADC benefits. The benefits are calculated by the number of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Terry Christiansen v. Iowa Board of Educational ExaminersSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- Reguero v. Teacher Standards & Practices CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State of Iowa v. Iowa District Court for Jones CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
- Glowacki v. State of Iowa Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
- City of Carroll v. Municipal Fire & Police Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.