Legal Opinion

Pataskas v. Judeikis

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 2, 1951PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, C.J.

The plaintiff has a verdict on a count for alienation of the affections of his wife and loss of consortium. The defendant excepts to the refusal of a directed verdict in his favor and to the admission in evidence of two letters and a telegram which the plaintiff contended had been sent by the defendant to the plaintiff’s wife.

If the disputed letters were part of the evidence, there was no error in the refusal to direct a verdict for the defendant. There was evidence that, until “the defendant appeared,” the plaintiff and his wife lived happily with their two children in a house which was…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Noyes v. NoyesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. DuBois v. PowdrellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  3. Ventromile v. Malden Electric Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  4. Alden Bros. v. DunnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  5. Leave v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hastings Associates, Inc. v. Local 369 Building Fund, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
  2. Commonwealth v. PurdyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  3. Quinn v. WalshMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  4. Bond Pharmacy, Inc. v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  5. Krinsky v. Pilgrim Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API