Legal Opinion
Bond Pharmacy, Inc. v. City of Cambridge
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 4, 1959PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.
The plaintiff in this action of tort seeks to recover for the alleged negligence of the defendant in allowing water to enter the plaintiff’s premises. There was a verdict for the plaintiff, which was recorded under leave reserved. Various exceptions were saved by the defendant but those here pertinent are exceptions to the denial of its motions for a directed verdict and to enter a verdict in its favor under leave reserved; to the failure to grant certain of its requests for rulings; and to the admission of certain evidence.
The evidence most favorable to the plaintiff is as follows: The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Van Riper v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Piper v. ChildsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Denny v. Riverbank Court Hotel Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. SilversteinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- Lord v. Lowell Institution for SavingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MonahanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Commonwealth v. HartfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
- Commonwealth v. PurdyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
- Ricky Smith Pontiac, Inc. v. Subaru of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
- Squeri v. McCarrickMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.