Leave v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.
The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff, the defendant having admitted liability. It could have been found that the plaintiff was a musician of ability and that the injuries he sustained seriously interfered with the practice of his profession. The defendant’s exceptions relate to matters of evidence and to the alleged denial of certain requests for rulings.
One group of exceptions relates to the plaintiff’s testimony as to his losses from professional engagements that he was unable to keep. It could have been found that he *393lost engagements that he had, and some that had been arranged…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Boske v. ComingoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Commonwealth v. SaccoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Jennings v. RooneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
- Rizzo v. CunninghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Whipple v. RichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Webb v. Standard Oil Co. of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Commonwealth v. MannosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- In Re L. Joyce HampersCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Finance Commission of Boston v. McGrathMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- Tollefsen v. PhillipsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1954
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.