Legal Opinion

Krinsky v. Pilgrim Trust Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 16, 1958PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.

This is an action of contract upon an account annexed for money had and received by the defendant to the plaintiff’s use. The defendant’s answer contains a general denial and an allegation of payment. The ease is here upon exceptions to the denial of the plaintiff’s motion for the direction of a verdict in his favor, to the allowance of the defendant’s motion for the direction of a verdict, and to divers rulings.

The facts upon nearly all of the issues are supported by documentary evidence and are undisputed, leaving open for decision the principal issue whether the indorsements appearing on…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Hartmann v. Boston Herald-Traveler Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  2. Furber v. DaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  3. National Mahaiwe Bank v. PeckMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  4. Young v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810
  5. DuBois v. PowdrellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp. v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  2. Gishen v. Dura Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  3. Society National Bank of Cleveland v. Capital National BankOhio Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Taylor v. Lotus Development Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1995
  5. Mississippi State Highway Commission v. MorganMississippi Supreme Court · 1964

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API