Courter Oil Co. v. Oklahoma City
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.
This appeal involves the failure of the Courter Oil Company, plaintiff in error, to post a bond in the supi of $200,000, as required by Ordinance 3944 of the city of Oklahoma City in reference to drilling of an oil and gas well within the TJ-7 drilling zone of said city.
We consider it unnecessary to discuss this question. This same question has received our consideration. See Gant v. Oklahoma City, 150 Okla. 86, 6 P. (2d) 1065; Gant v. Oklahoma City, 160 Okla. 62, 15 P. (2d) 833, which was affirmed by the Supreme Court of the United States, 289 U. S. 99, 77 L. Ed. 1058, 53 S. Ct. 530; C. C.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gant v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Gant v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- C. C. Julian Oil & Royalties Co. v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Gant v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Hud Oil & Refining Co. v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Van Meter v. H. F. Wilcox Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Ex Parte BiggsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1935