Legal Opinion
Gant v. Oklahoma City
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 10, 1933No. 547PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutherland
■ The bill of complaint alleges that plaintiffs (appellants here) are lessees of a tract of land in Oklahoma City, State of Oklahoma, supposed to contain gas and oil; that by the terms of the lease they are required to commence drilling a well within a time fixed; that they have contracted for such drilling and the Work .has been begun and is now in progress* that they have a permit from the authorities of the city as required by prdinance, but defendants threaten to and will forcibly stop the work, to plaintiffs’ irreparable damage, unless they execute and file, a bond conditioned as…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Packard v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Zahn v. Board of Public WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Standard Oil Co. v. City of MarysvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Otis v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. McCabeSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Colgate v. HarveySupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- General Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Department of Public WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Neild v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.