Legal Opinion

Gant v. Oklahoma City

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 12, 1931No. 21798PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKornegay, J.

This is a proceeding in error from the district court of Oklahoma county. Three district judges sat on the hearing, consisting of Judges Harve L. Melton, T. G. Chambers, and Lucius Babcock. The order complained of in the matter can be found at page 188 of the case-made, and is as follows:

“In the District Court in and for Oklahoma County, Oklahoma.
“Walter H. Gant, Knox L. Garvin, and A. D. Hudspeth, Plaintiffs, v. City of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, a Municipal Corporation, and J. W. Van Meter, Defendants. No. 65300.
“Order.
“This matter cam© on to be heard on the 6th day of October, 1930, on the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Gant v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Van Meter v. H. F. Wilcox Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Gant v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. C. C. Julian Oil & Royalties Co. v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. City of Midwest City v. House of Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API