Legal Opinion

C. C. Julian Oil & Royalties Co. v. Oklahoma City

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 20, 1934No. 21722PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Oklahoma county enjoining the plaintiff in error, the -defendant in the trial court, from proceeding with the drilling of a well for oil or gas on property within the corporate limits of the city of Oklahoma City. The judgment was based on a finding that the defendant was violating a provision of city ordinance No. 3944 in that it was drilling a well for oil or gas without furnishing the bond required by a provision of that ordinance, as follows:

“No permit for the drilling or putting down of any petroleum or natural gas well shall be…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Dobbins v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Ohio Oil Company v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. Standard Oil Co. v. City of MarysvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Vinson v. MedleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  2. Royal Baking Co. v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Keaton v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Hud Oil & Refining Co. v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Shinn v. Oklahoma CityCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API