Legal Opinion
Aaron v. Conservation Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 26, 1979PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBogdanski, J.
This appeal stems from the refusal of the trial court to entertain a declaratory judgment action brought by the plaintiff. There is no dispute as to the facts. The defendant commission admitted the allegations of the complaint and the parties have stipulated to certain facts and exhibits as the only evidence in the case.
The plaintiff is a property owner and a builder of residential homes in the town of Redding where he owns an 11.6 acre parcel of land and certain other properties. In 1974, the Redding conservation commission, the town’s inland wetlands agency, adopted regulations which…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Bianco v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Hartford Electric Light Co. v. Water Resources CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Sage-Allen Co., Inc. v. WheelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Sigal v. WiseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Heslin v. Connecticut Law Clinic of Trantolo & TrantoloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Cahill v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Aaron v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Cannata v. Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Doe v. MaherConnecticut Superior Court · 1986
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.