Peter B. v. Central Intelligence Agency
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
SCULLIN, Senior Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Pending before the Court are Defendant Central Intelligence Agency’s (“CIA”) motion for summary judgment 2 and Plaintiffs response thereto, which includes a motion for additional discovery pursuant to Rule 56(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
II.BACKGROUND
A. Factual background 3
Defendant CIA hired Plaintiff as a covert contract employee on January 22, 1992, for a two-year term. See Declaration of Angela Pierson (“Pierson Decl.”) at ¶ 4. The contract provided that Defendant CIA could extend it for additional periods. See…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Jane Doe v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- O'Donnell, Philip v. Barry, Marion S.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Arif H. Mosrie v. Marion S. Barry, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.