Legal Opinion

Peter B. v. Central Intelligence Agency

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 30, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2006-1652Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER

SCULLIN, Senior Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

Pending before the Court are Defendant Central Intelligence Agency’s (“CIA”) motion for summary judgment 2 and Plaintiffs response thereto, which includes a motion for additional discovery pursuant to Rule 56(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

II.BACKGROUND

A. Factual background 3

Defendant CIA hired Plaintiff as a covert contract employee on January 22, 1992, for a two-year term. See Declaration of Angela Pierson (“Pierson Decl.”) at ¶ 4. The contract provided that Defendant CIA could extend it for additional periods. See…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Jane Doe v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  4. O'Donnell, Philip v. Barry, Marion S.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  5. Arif H. Mosrie v. Marion S. Barry, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API