Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Dennard v. Rollins

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 23, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2025-0879Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHARLES DENNARD, et al., Plaintiff, Case No. 1:25-cv-879 (ACR) v. BROOKE ROLLINS, Secretary of Agriculture et al., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court are three motions. Pro se Plaintiffs Charles Dennard and Corey Lea move to stay this case and remand it to a United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Administrative Law Judge, Dkt. 14, and seek leave to issue third-party subpoenas, Dkt. 22. Defendants—USDA and its Secretary Brooke Rollins—move to dismiss Plaintiffs’ complaint. Dkt. 23. For the reasons stated…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API