Legal Opinion

Arch Chemicals, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 7, 2005No. 04-1421CPublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

WOLSKI, Judge.

This pre-award bid protest action is before the Court on a motion and cross-motion for judgment upon the administrative record. Plaintiff, Arch Chemicals, Inc. (“Arch”), is the incumbent producer and supplier of hydrazine for defendant United States (“Government”). Arch challenges the solicitation for a new hydrazine contract on two grounds. It argues that the Government’s interpretation of the Solicitation’s domestic source restriction clause is contrary to law or otherwise lacks a rational basis; and that the Solicitation’s price evaluation methodology lacks a…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. DMS All-Star Joint Venture v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  2. Tech Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  3. Fort Carson Support Services v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  4. MORI Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  5. Supreme Foodservice Gmbh v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API