Arch Chemicals, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WOLSKI, Judge.
This pre-award bid protest action is before the Court on a motion and cross-motion for judgment upon the administrative record. Plaintiff, Arch Chemicals, Inc. (“Arch”), is the incumbent producer and supplier of hydrazine for defendant United States (“Government”). Arch challenges the solicitation for a new hydrazine contract on two grounds. It argues that the Government’s interpretation of the Solicitation’s domestic source restriction clause is contrary to law or otherwise lacks a rational basis; and that the Solicitation’s price evaluation methodology lacks a…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- DMS All-Star Joint Venture v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Tech Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Fort Carson Support Services v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- MORI Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Supreme Foodservice Gmbh v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.