Commonwealth v. Carlisle
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
This appeal by the Commonwealth from an order suppressing evidence of a gambling operation seized by police during execution of a search warrant requires that we determine (1) whether the affidavit recited facts sufficient to constitute probable cause, and (2) whether the premises to be searched were described in the warrant with sufficient particularity. We conclude that the search warrant was valid and reverse the order of the trial court suppressing evidence seized by the police.
On May 9, 1983, police applied for a warrant to search. The application described the premises to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Commonwealth v. DuggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. StampsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. AmbersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LemanskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. WaltsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. CarlisleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.