D'ANGELO v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.
The plaintiff, the widow and dependent of Antonio D’Angelo, was awarded compensation for his death. The Superior Court affirmed the award, and the defendant has appealed. It has abandoned its assignment of error seeking corrections in the commissioner’s finding and is restricted on this appeal to its claim that the subordinate facts found by the commissioner, with the single correction he made in the finding, do not support his conclusion that the decedent sustained an injury which arose out of and in the course of his employment and as a result of which he died. That is the only question…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hartz v. Hartford Faience Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Glodenis v. American Brass Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Triano v. United States Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Mathurin v. City of PutnamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Dilauro v. BassettiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Balkus v. Terry Steam Turbine Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Murchison v. Skinner Precision Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- DiNuzzo v. Dan Perkins Chevrolet Geo, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Tovish v. Gerber ElectronicsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Gordon v. United Aircraft CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.