Legal Opinion

Drainage District No. 1 Reformed v. Matthews

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 13, 1950No. 41649PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConkling, P. J.

[ 569] Plaintiffs (a Drainage District and certain landowners and taxpayers therein) appealed from the order of the circuit court of Stoddard County sustaining the defendants’ motion to dismiss the second amended petition filed by plaintiffs, and entering judgment for defendants, in an action wherein plaintiffs sought to enjoin the payment of sixty-six certain drainage district maintenance warrants drawn and issued by the county court of Stoddard County in 1936 and 1937 in the total amount of $17,303.20. In the petition plaintiffs also sought judgment against defendants for $16,145.72 alleged…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Harmon v. Auditor of Public AccountsIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Clark v. WolfSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  3. Norwood v. NorwoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  4. Hall v. Wilder Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  5. Taylor v. SartoriousMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. American Polled Hereford Ass'n v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  2. Davis v. HauschildSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  3. Reis v. La PrestoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  4. Norval v. WhitesellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  5. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. v. BriggsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API