Legal Opinion

Varnal v. Kansas City

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 3, 1972No. 25634PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROSS, Judge.

Summary judgment was rendered in favor of defendants Kansas City, Missouri and P. W. Halloran, on grounds this action was barred by a former judgment in a federal court and that the relief plaintiffs sought was not recoverable against defendants by reason of their immunity from liability in performing a governmental function. Plaintiffs appeal.

We state the history of the litigation chronologically. 1 On September 21, 1967, plaintiffs filed in the United States Court for the Western District of Missouri a petition against the defendants named herein, prefaced by an introductory…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. William Whirl v. C. v. (Buster) Kern and Fidelity and Deposit Company of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. Parish v. PittsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  5. Norwood v. NorwoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. American Polled Hereford Ass'n v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  2. Duncan v. ClementsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  3. Peoples-Home Life Ins. Co. v. HaakeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Newson v. City of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Jackson v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API