Legal Opinion

72 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,213, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 778, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1060 Carolyn Arno v. Club Med Boutique Inc. Club Med Inc. Club Med Sales Inc. Club Mediterranee S.A. Club Med Management Services Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 29, 1998No. 96-16435Published

1Opinion of the Court

134 F.3d 1424

72 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,213, 98 Cal. Daily

Op. Serv. 778,

98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1060

Carolyn ARNO, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CLUB MED BOUTIQUE INC.; Club Med Inc.; Club Med Sales

Inc.; Club Mediterranee S.A.; Club Med

Management Services Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-16435.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Oct. 6, 1997.

Decided Jan. 29, 1998.

James C. Sturdevant, Kim E. Card, The Sturdevant Law Firm, San Francisco, CA, Barbara A. Lawless, Therese M. Lawless, Lawless, Horowitz & Lawless, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Bettina B. Plevan,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Hurtado v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Reich v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Grant v. McAuliffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Arno v. Club Med Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API