Legal Opinion
Grant v. McAuliffe
California Supreme Court
Decided December 23, 1953No. Sac. 6416; Sac. 6417; Sac. 6418PublishedCited by 99 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.
On December 17, 1949, plaintiffs W. R. Grant and R. M. Manchester were riding west on United States Highway 66 in an automobile owned and driven by plaintiff D. O. Jensen. Defendant’s decedent, W. W. Pullen, was driving his automobile east on the same highway. The two automobiles collided at a point approximately 15 miles east of Flagstaff, Arizona. Jensen’s automobile was badly damaged, and Jensen, Grant, and Manchester suffered personal injuries. Nineteen days later, on January 5, 1950, Pullen died as a result of injuries received in the collision. Defendant McAuliffe was appointed…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Martin's Administrator v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Patton v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Biewend v. BiewendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. Janice Wiener and Catherine B. Nollenberger (Excluding Faith C. Paris), United States of America v. Janice WienerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Reich v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.