Tanenbaum v. Freundlich
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal from a judgment of the City Court, entered upon a verdict of a jury, in favor of the plaintiff, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtClarke, J.
Action by a fire insurance broker to recover damages for breach of contract. The first paragraph of the written contract provides: “That the said firm of I. Tanenbaum, Son & Co., is hereby authorized to and shall, as the agents of the party of the second part and for his account, procure and pay premiums for all fire insurance required by the party of the second part, not less, however than Twenty thousand dollars per year and not less than the market value at any time, of the prop*820erty insured, for the period of three years from the sixth day of February 1899 to the Sixth day of February…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Michael v. Prussian National InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stuyvesant Ins. Co. v. Jacksonville Oil MillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
- Piedmont-Mt. Airy Guano Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926
- I. Tanenbaum, Son & Co. v. Rothenberg & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Wilson & Toomer Fertilizer Co. v. Automobile Ins.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1922
- Jacksonville Oil Mills v. Stuyvesant Ins.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1925