Legal Opinion

Stuyvesant Ins. Co. v. Jacksonville Oil Mill

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 5, 1926No. 4407, 4408PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SESSIONS, District Judge.

These two cases were tried together in the court below and have been heard together in this court. Each of the insurance companies (plaintiffs in error) issued and delivered to the Jacksonville Oil Mill (defendant in error) a policy insuring it against loss by fire of the use and occupancy of a cotton seed oil mill at Jacksonville, Tex., for a term expiring March 31, 1922. The two policies are alike, except as to the amount of insurance and the premium paid; one being for an amount not exceeding $10,000, and the other for an amount not exceeding $13,400. The material…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Michael v. Prussian National InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. PipkinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  3. Fidelity Union Fire Ins. Co. v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. Lite v. Firemen's InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  5. Tanenbaum v. SimonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Saxhaug v. County of JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  2. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh v. California Cotton Credit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  3. Gerhard v. Boston Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. City of Kingsville v. MeredithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
  5. Eisenson v. Home Ins.District Court, N.D. Florida · 1949

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API