Jacksonville Oil Mills v. Stuyvesant Ins.
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, District Judge.
Suit was brought by plaintiff in each of the above-styled eases against each defendant on an insurance policy issued by the defendants, respectively, commonly called a “use and occupancy” policy. The suits grew out of the destruction by fire of the same property insured by each of the defendants, and the suits were consolidated and heard together.
Plaintiff is a corporation located at Jacksonville, Tex. Each defendant is a corporation, but neither was suable in the state of Texas, and inasmuch as eaeh was doing business in the state of Tennessee, and represented by agents…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Janneck v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Matthews v. . American Central Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Michael v. Prussian National InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Tanenbaum v. FreundlichAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1903
3Cited by2 opinions
- Shakertown Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
- Oppenheim's, Inc. v. KavanaghDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1950