Legal Opinion

Yuhasz v. Pitt Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 1, 1931No. Appeal, 112PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Walling,

The plaintiff, Elizabeth Yuhasz, brought this action to recover for the death of her husband, John Yuhasz. The Pitt Construction Company, defendant, in the construction of a retaining wall in Duquesne Boulevard in the City of Duquesne, near the head of the Oliver Street stairs, dug a trench in the bed of the cartway eight and one-half feet deep and about six feet wide. The conditions were such that pedestrians, of whom some fifteen hundred passed daily, had to walk along a narrow way near the trench. As a barrier to guard the trench, the defendant placed a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Howarth v. Adams Express Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Jones v. Counties Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Lane v. DickinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Ruggles v. MooreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. O'Malley v. Borough of ParsonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kulka v. NemirovskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Vetter v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Cathcart v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Williams v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Shipley v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API