Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Prudential Securities Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 26, 1997No. Civil Action No. 93-2164 (EGS)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
SULLIVAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the motion of John H. Lomax, Ann D. Lomax, Emory C. Camp and Dr. Robert Callewart (“proposed intervenors”) to intervene as of right pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a)(2), or, in the alternative, for permissive intervention pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 24(b). For the following reasons, the proposed intervenors’ motion to intervene is DENIED.
*2I. BACKGROUND
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) commenced this action in October 1993, charging Prudential Securities Incorporated…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Dimond v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Captain Stewart W. Beckett v. Air Line Pilots AssociationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Berger v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Credit Bancorp, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Caledonian Bank Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. CallahanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. FalorDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Kings Real Estate Investment TrustDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.