Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Caledonian Bank Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 28, 2016No. 15cv894PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, District Judge:
The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), along with Caledonian Bank Ltd. and Caledonian Securities Ltd. (collectively, “Caledonian”) move for approval of a proposed consent decree. Non-party Sentinel *362Trust Services, Ltd. (“Sentinel”), the putative owner of equity interests in Caledonian, objects to the proposed consent decree and seeks to intervene in this enforcement action. Sentinel’s motion to intervene is denied and the proposed consent decree is approved.
BACKGROUND
On February 6, 2015, the SEC filed this enforcement action…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. First Jersey Securities, Inc. And Robert E. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. RazmilovicCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- James Jay Ball, Debtor-Appellant v. A.O. Smith Corporation, Creditor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- James Benjamin v. Michael Jacobson, Commissioner of the Department of Correction of the City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. N.Y.C. Hous. Auth.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Acosta v. BratcherDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2018
- Acosta v. AllenDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2023
- Cruz v. JKS Ventures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2024
- Cruz v. JKS Ventures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2024
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.