Legal Opinion

Noonoo v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 31, 1957No. C. D. 1904PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WilsoN, Judge:

The merchandise in the case at bar covers certain sheepskins and goatskins imported from Iraq, Iran, Lebanon, and Syria, which were classified under paragraph 1530 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 at the rate of 10 per centum ad valorem as “vegetable-tanned rough leather made from goat or sheep skins (including those commercially known as India-tanned goat or sheep skins).” Plaintiffs contend that said merchandise should be held properly free of duty under paragraph 1765 of the act as “Skins of all kinds, raw, and hides not specially provided for.”

At a pretrial conference, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fleming-Joffe, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  2. Rice & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
  3. United States v. RobertsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. Sherrard v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  5. Stern v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Loewengart v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
  2. A. S. Leather Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  3. Aboudi v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  4. American Meshed Fur Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  5. Andres v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API