Rice & Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Walker, Judge:
Tbe merchandise involved in this suit is described on the invoices as “East India Partially Tanned Cow Hides,” and was assessed with duty by the collector of customs at the rate of 15 per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 1530 (b) (4) of the Tariff Act of 1930 for “leather made from * * * kip skins * * The claim mainly relied upon by the plaintiff is one made by amendment to the protest to the effect that the imported merchandise is not leather but hides of cattle of the bovine species.proc- ' essed in some manner for preservation, but retaining their character…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hampton v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- Causse Mfg. Co. v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1906
3Cited by24 opinions
- Fleming-Joffe, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
- Noonoo v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
- Protest 101148-K of BarnetUnited States Customs Court · 1944
- Protest 101156-K of Hugo Brand Tannery Co.United States Customs Court · 1944
- Protest 103786-K of BarnetUnited States Customs Court · 1944
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.