Legal Opinion

United States v. Robertson

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 27, 1911No. 418PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from decisions of the Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7042 (T. D. 30720) and Abstract 23746 (T. D. 30828).

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, Judge

In the months of November and December, 1909, the appellees, L. F. Robertson & Sons, imported from Japan a quantity of leather packed in cases.

*380It is conceded that the importation was dutiable, and that the rate of duty was governed by paragraph 451, tariff act of 1909. The following parts of that paragraph contain all the provisions relevant to this case:

B ind., bend, or belting leather, rough leather, and sole leather, five per centum ad valorem; dressed upper and all other leather, calfskins tanned or tanned and dressed, kangaroo, sheep and goat skins (including lamb and kid skins) dressed…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fleming-Joffe, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  2. Noonoo v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  3. Loewengart v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API