Royal Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Commission
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knous
Plaintiffs in error, respectively the Royal Indemnity Company, insurance carrier, and the Morey Mercantile Company, the alleged employer, here seek review of a judgment of the district court affirming an award of compensation by the Industrial Commission to the claimant, defendant in error Hagemeier, under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. There is no conflict in the evidence and the sole question relates to the legal effect of the undisputed facts. The claimant, a carpenter by trade, engaged solely as such, resides at Sterling. The Morey company is engaged in the wholesale…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lackey v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
- J. P. O. Sandwich Shop, Inc. v. PapadopoulosIndiana Court of Appeals · 1938
- Comerford v. CarrSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
- Hoshiko v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
- State ex rel. Lundgren v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Denver Truck Exchange & State Compensation Insurance Fund v. PerrymanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
- Heckman v. WarrenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
- Kamp v. DisneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
- Garrison v. GortlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
- Benavidez v. Sierra Blanca MotorsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.