Legal Opinion

Hoshiko v. Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 23, 1928No. 11,970PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler

Cervando Lomeli was kicked by a horse and injured while working for Paul Hoshiko. The Industrial Commission awarded Lomeli compensation in the sum of $54.18, increased 50 per cent by reason of Hoshiko’s failure to carry insurance, making the total award $81.27. The district court upheld the award. For reversal, Hoshiko relies upon two points. It is said that Lomeli was a farm laborer, and also that he was a casual employee ; and it is contended that for each of these reasons he is not entitled to the benefit of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. True, if he was a farm laborer, or if his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lackey v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  2. Roush v. HeffelbowerMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Industrial Commission v. ShadowenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
  4. Industrial Commission v. ElkasSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  5. Employers' Mutual Insurance v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Asheville Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Heckman v. WarrenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  3. Comerford v. CarrSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
  4. State Ex Rel. Bettman v. ChristenOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Baldwin, State Treasurer v. RobyWyoming Supreme Court · 1939

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API