Hoshiko v. Industrial Commission
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler
Cervando Lomeli was kicked by a horse and injured while working for Paul Hoshiko. The Industrial Commission awarded Lomeli compensation in the sum of $54.18, increased 50 per cent by reason of Hoshiko’s failure to carry insurance, making the total award $81.27. The district court upheld the award. For reversal, Hoshiko relies upon two points. It is said that Lomeli was a farm laborer, and also that he was a casual employee ; and it is contended that for each of these reasons he is not entitled to the benefit of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. True, if he was a farm laborer, or if his…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lackey v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
- Roush v. HeffelbowerMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Industrial Commission v. ShadowenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
- Industrial Commission v. ElkasSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
- Employers' Mutual Insurance v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
3Cited by19 opinions
- Johnson v. Asheville Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Heckman v. WarrenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
- Comerford v. CarrSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
- State Ex Rel. Bettman v. ChristenOhio Supreme Court · 1934
- Baldwin, State Treasurer v. RobyWyoming Supreme Court · 1939
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.