Legal Opinion

Ridenhour v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 25, 1991No. CR 91-39PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

Appellant, Jeffrey Ridenhour, was arrested on December 23, 1988, and charged by police citation with driving while intoxicated. On September 13, 1989, he filed a motion to dismiss on the ground the arresting officer did not meet the required minimum standards, and, therefore, any action taken by him was invalid. Before the motion was ruled upon, Act 44 of 1989 became law. That act provides that action taken by non-qualified officers “shall not be held invalid.” The act expressly applies to pending cases. The trial court denied appellant’s motion to dismiss, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  2. Beazell v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Kring v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Grable v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  5. Mitchell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kemp v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Diffee v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  3. State Ex Rel. Collins v. BedellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Smith v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  5. McEntire v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API