Legal Opinion

Smith v. City of Little Rock

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 1, 1991No. CR 91-53PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert L. Brown, Justice.

The appellant, James M. Smith, appeals his convictions for driving while intoxicated and driving left of the center line. He raises two arguments for reversal: 1) the arrest was not valid because the arresting officer did not meet the minimum law enforcement standards and did not have his certificate of appointment with him at the time of arrest; and 2) the arresting officer was without authority to make the arrest.

We find no merit in the appellant’s arguments, and we affirm the trial court’s decision.

The facts are these. On October 17, 1989, at 1:56 a.m., the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Kittler v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  3. Ridenhour v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  4. Dacus v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Tullock v. EckSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Gaines v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Fuller v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  4. United States v. Phillip Cornelius PulliamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  5. Land O'Frost, Inc. v. PledgerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API