Mitchell v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Tom Glaze, Justice.
This is an appeal from the appellant’s conviction of driving while intoxicated, first offense, and driving off a laned highway. The appellant moved for the charges to be dismissed and made a motion for suppression of the evidence on the basis that the Bradford city police officer was not qualified to effect appellant’s arrest because the officer had not met the minimum standards as provided in the Arkansas Commission on Law Enforcement Standards and Training. The trial judge found that the police department had shown substantial compliance with the requirements of the law…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Grable v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Seubold v. Fort Smith Special School DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Helms v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
3Cited by15 opinions
- Haynes v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Huls v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Ridenhour v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- State v. HenrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Ellis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.