Legal Opinion

Dunnegan v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 14, 1926PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlbert, J.

A general statement of the facts is all that is necessary to a consideration of the questions involved in this ruling.

Appellants had a contract for construction of a sewer in the city of Omaha. They had a drag line at Sheffield, Illinois, where they were doing some work on a government highway. On the 4th of August, 1922, the appellee furnished a flat car, and the drag line was loaded thereon, preparatory to shipment to Omaha. The car thus loaded was carried to Silvis, Illinois, a division point, where the train was broken up and this car placed on another train going westward. When the train…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co. v. Chicago & Erie RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Bennett v. Incorporated Town of Mount VernonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  3. Veith v. CassidySupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  4. City National Bank v. MasonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  5. Davis v. HansenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Winter v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  2. Deweese v. Iowa Transit LinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  3. Young v. Jacobsen BrothersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  4. Peet Stock Remedy Co. v. BrueneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  5. McKeehan v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API