City National Bank v. Mason
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Hardin District Court. — E. M. Wright, Judge. Action on a promissory note resulted in judgment for the defendants. The plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
On August 12, 1913, defendants executed their promissory note to the De Soto Motor Car Co. for $522.16, payable on or before January 1, 1914. The note was transferred to plaintiff on or about October 1, 1913, being indorsed “De Soto Motor Car Co., per L. A. Miller.” It ivas given in renewal of one of the two notes of $500 each, executed in August, 1912, the other renewal having been paid. Defendants pleaded: (1) That the original notes were without consideration; and (2) that one Field obtained said notes through the perpetration of fraud on the defendants; and these issues were submitted to…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- McNight v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Arnd v. AylesworthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- B.L., T. S.D. Co. v. . K.T. M.M.A. Assn.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Rule v. CareySupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- State v. CooperSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lange v. BedellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Borough v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- City National Bank of Auburn v. MasonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
- Wilkinson v. Queal Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Sullivan v. GaulSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.