Legal Opinion

Peet Stock Remedy Co. v. Bruene

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 14, 1930No. 39473PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFaville, J.

Appellant sued in two counts, one seeking to recover on a promissory note in the principal sum of $200. The second count sued on was based on a note of $166.50. Appellee admitted liability on the note pleaded hi Count 1 of the petition, and judgment was entered in favor of the appellant and against the appellee for the amount due on said note.

As to the note sued on in Count 2, the appellee pleaded a counterclaim in three counts, the first being based upon fraud, the second upon express warranty, and the third upon implied warranty. Each of said counts prayed recovery in the sum of $627, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bean v. BickleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  2. In Re Estate of DolmageSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  3. Veith v. CassidySupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  4. Reinertson v. StruthersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  5. Rice v. Friend Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rasmus v. AO Smith CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1958
  2. Landers v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Balik v. FlackerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  4. Broer v. Dr. Fenton's Vigortone Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  5. In Re Estate of ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API