State Ex Rel. Peterson v. Burt
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.
The sole issue presented on this appeal is as follows: Does sec. 28.05 (3) (f) 1, Madison General Ordinances, providing for relinquishment of nonconforming use if such use is discontinued for a continuous period of one year, eliminate the necessity of proving intent to abandon?
It is undisputed that the two residential buildings in question were vacant from at least September of 1966 to September of 1967.
Sec. 28.05 (3) (f) 1, Madison General Ordinances, provides :
“If the nonconforming use of a building or structure, all or substantially all of which is designed or intended for a use which is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Morehouse v. HuntWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
- State Ex Rel. Covenant Harbor Bible Camp v. SteinkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- State ex rel. Schaetz v. MandersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Franmor Realty Corp. v. Le BoeufNew York Supreme Court · 1951
- State Ex Rel. Brill v. MortensonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Essex Leasing, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Marchese v. Norristown Borough Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Boles v. City of ChattanoogaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
- Town of Brighton v. GriffinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
- City of Minot v. FisherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.