Boles v. City of Chattanooga
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUSANO, Judge.
This is a declaratory judgment action involving zoning issues. The Defendant City of Chattanooga appeals the Judgment of the trial court permitting the Plaintiffs to continue the “non-conforming” use of their property as the site of an “adult-oriented establishment.” The Chancellor, sitting without a jury, found that the failure of the Plaintiffs to operate an adult-oriented establishment on their property for a period of approximately 22 months (from November 10, 1987, to August 30,1989) did not constitute a discontinuance of a non-conforming use under the Chattanooga…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Schad v. Borough of Mount EphraimSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Whittemore v. Brentwood Planning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
- Canada's Tavern, Inc. v. Town of Glen EchoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Plough, Inc. v. Premier Pneumatics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- 421 Corp. v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- OUTDOOR MANAGEMENT, LLC v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007
- Steppach v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2011
- Lions Head Homeowners' Ass'n v. Metropolitan Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
- Chadwell v. Knox CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.