Legal Opinion

Boles v. City of Chattanooga

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided July 5, 1994PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUSANO, Judge.

This is a declaratory judgment action involving zoning issues. The Defendant City of Chattanooga appeals the Judgment of the trial court permitting the Plaintiffs to continue the “non-conforming” use of their property as the site of an “adult-oriented establishment.” The Chancellor, sitting without a jury, found that the failure of the Plaintiffs to operate an adult-oriented establishment on their property for a period of approximately 22 months (from November 10, 1987, to August 30,1989) did not constitute a discontinuance of a non-conforming use under the Chattanooga…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Schad v. Borough of Mount EphraimSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Whittemore v. Brentwood Planning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  4. Canada's Tavern, Inc. v. Town of Glen EchoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  5. Plough, Inc. v. Premier Pneumatics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. 421 Corp. v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  2. OUTDOOR MANAGEMENT, LLC v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007
  3. Steppach v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2011
  4. Lions Head Homeowners' Ass'n v. Metropolitan Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  5. Chadwell v. Knox CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API