Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Covenant Harbor Bible Camp v. Steinke

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1959PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The parties agree that relator’s use of its premises for a bible camp is nonconforming. Respondents take the position that this use has been nonconforming ever since ordinance No. 237 was enacted in 1949. Relator apparently takes the position that this use conformed to the ordinance until ordinance No. 265 was enacted in 1953, removing certain enumerated uses from the list of uses permitted in the district in which relator’s property is located. Since the extent of relator’s use of the premises was increased in 1951 by the construction of three cabins, the extent of the nonconforming use…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. HillmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  2. Palazzola v. City of GulfportMississippi Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Baird v. BradleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Service Oil Co. v. RhodusSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  2. Marris v. City of CedarburgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Klinger v. Oneida CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  4. The Bible Speaks v. Board of Appeals of LenoxMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  5. Pelham Esplanade, Inc. v. Board of TrusteesNew York Court of Appeals · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API