Legal Opinion
Seidel v. Kirby
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided October 27, 2017No. CIVIL NO. JKB–17–0292PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
James K. Bredar, Chief Judge *747MEMORANDUM
Plaintiffs are Maryland residents who have brought this action against five out-of-state Defendants in response to alleged abusive behavior that Defendants engaged in online. Defendants moved to dismiss Plaintiffs' complaint for failure to state a claim (ECF No. 7) and in response Plaintiffs amended their complaint (ECF No. 8). The Defendants now bring a second motion to dismiss, this time for lack of personal jurisdiction, improper venue, or, in the alternative, dismissal under the doctrine of forum non conveniens (ECF No. 13). Plaintiffs have responded…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Maria Jimena Ibarra v. United States of America Unknown Government OfficersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Serv. Women's Action Network v. MattisDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Fox, J. v. Smith, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Artis v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- Benson J. Fischer v. Nautical Bowls Franchising, LLC, et al.District Court, D. Maryland · 2026
- Birara v. KelelDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2019
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.