Legal Opinion

Artis v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided February 27, 2020No. 8:18-cv-02575Unknown

1Opinion

F fhop rs US Dicrs CU Pye Tr PRUE I COP □□ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CISTRIC] OF Many i □ FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND bese □□ Ludi FES oy on PA OUR 07 PARIS ARTIS, * CLERK * ws Plaintiff, pro se, * Jo * * Civil No. PJM 18-2575 * RECEIVABLES PERFORMANCE * MANAGEMENT, LLC, □ * Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Paris A. Artis, pro se,! filed this action in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, Maryland against T-Mobile USA, Inc. and Receivables Performance Management, Inc. (“RPM”). ECF No. 1.7RPM removed the case to this Court on diversity grounds. Jd. For the following…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. David T. Combs Sarah E. Combs v. James O. Bakker Tammy Faye Bakker Richard DortchCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  5. Carefirst of Maryland, Inc. v. Carefirst Pregnancy Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API