Mahoning Savings & Trust Co. v. Kellner
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStephenson, J.
The parties will be referred to in this opinion as they appeared in the trial court, namely, Katherina Kellner, administratrix,' as plaintiff, and Frank G. Greer, as Dr. Greer, except where if is necessary to refer to them as plaintiff in error and defendant in error.
Plaintiff in error naturally claims that the trial court did not err in directing a verdict, and defendant in error claims it did. In this contention we come squarely to the proposition, considering plaintiff’s evidence in its most favorable light to her, could reasonable minds have reached a different conclusion therefrom? This…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Spalding v. WaxlerOhio Supreme Court · 1965
- Brandt v. Mansfield Rapid Transit, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
- Bennett v. Sinclair Refining Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
- Simko v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1938
- Gelfand v. Strohecker, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.