Legal Opinion

Gelfand v. Strohecker, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided August 1, 1956No. Civ. A. 29571-29573PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEICK, District Judge.

These cases were consolidated, and tried before a jury, resulting in verdicts in favor of the plaintiffs (Rose Gelfand for $10,000, Harvey Gelfand, a minor for $3,500 and Judy Gelfand, a minor for $1,000).

Written interrogatories were submitted by the Court to the jury under Rule 49(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., which were answered as follows:

“Interrogatory No. 1.
“Was the defendant negligent? If so, of what did it consist? Answer. Yes. Not using due caution considering weather conditions of the highway.”
“Interrogatory No. 2.
“Was Herman Gelfand…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Masters v. New York Central Rd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Davison v. FlowersOhio Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Carpenter v. Baltimore & O. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
  4. Brandt v. Mansfield Rapid Transit, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Baier v. Cleveland Ry. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Chadwick v. Air Reduction CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1965
  2. Patterson v. CushmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Robertson v. GrotheerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Cincinnati Bell, Inc. v. HinterlongHamilton County Municipal Court · 1981
  5. O'SULLIVAN v. Joy Technologies, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API