Brandt v. Mansfield Rapid Transit, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWeygandt, C. J.
Two questions are presented for the consideration of this court.
The first relates to certain testimony of the plaintiff’s only physician concerning the claim of the plaintiff that as a result of her injuries she suffered a premature menopause at the age of thirty-six years. Her physician was asked to express his opinion whether there was a causal connection between the injuries and the menopause.
“A. I can’t answer it yes or no, I don’t know; it could happen, sure.
“(Counsel for defendant moved the answer be; stricken.)
“Court: Do you have an opinion? > a
“Witness: Well, I have an opinion, yes. ■…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Drakulich v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1940
- Drew v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1940
- Pfister v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1942
- Mahoning Savings & Trust Co. v. KellnerOhio Supreme Court · 1936
3Cited by32 opinions
- Shumaker v. Oliver B. Cannon & Sons, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
- Spalding v. WaxlerOhio Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. Harry, Ca2008-01-013 (12-8-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
- Rogoff v. KingOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.