Legal Opinion
State v. McLain
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 12, 1981No. Crim. 730-APublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PEDERSON, Justice.
Steven McLain was convicted of the crime of gross sexual imposition. We affirmed the conviction in State v. McLain, 301 N.W.2d 616 (N.D.1981). Subsequently, McLain retained a different lawyer to investigate additional avenues of relief. Pursuant to Rule 33(b) of the North Dakota Rules of Criminal Procedure, a motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence was filed. The court, after an evidentiary hearing, ruled, in part, that the proffered evidence did not satisfy the requirements for a new trial. 1 This appeal is from the order denying McLain’s motion…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Ernest C. Hamilton, Lloyd E. Hennigan, Jr., Philip J. Shaheen, Jr., and Henri LoridansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- State v. CrayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- State v. OlmsteadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. SteppNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
- State v. McLainNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. KringstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. VanNattaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. SkaroNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. DilgerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. KoppNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.