Legal Opinion

State v. Bowe

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1928PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pugh, Bist. J.

Prom a judgment of conviction on an information charging- him with an assault with intent to commit rape and denial of his motion for a newr trial, defendant appeals.

It is unnecessary in the decision of this case to set forth the evidence. On his brief and upon oral argument defendant’s counsel conceded there is no prejudicial error in the admission of evidence and stated to the court, further, that the verdict of guilty rendered by the jury is substantially supported by the evidence. Nor a reversal of the judgment, defendant relies solely and entirely upon errors assigned which…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Coffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Agnew v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. State v. GlassNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Potter Realty Co. v. DerbyOregon Supreme Court · 1915

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Butler v. &198tna Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  3. State v. MarksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. BuchholzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. HazerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API