Legal Opinion

De Hart v. Continental Land & Fur Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 2, 1940No. 35832PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ODOM, Justice.

In stating the issues involved in the present suit, it is necessary to refer to our opinion and decree in the case of Continental Land & Fur Co., Inc., v. Norman Lacoste, reported in 192 La. 561, 188 So. 700, 706. That was a petitory action brought by the land company (one of the defendants in this suit) against Norman Lacoste, to establish its title to 10 acres of land located on the east bank of the Atchafalaya River in Terrebonne Parish, now known and referred to as “Shell Mound.” The defendant Lacoste claimed title to the land by virtue of two patents issued to his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Reed v. WarrenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  2. Succession of ToddSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  3. Norton v. Crescent City Ice Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  4. Heirs of Burney v. LudelingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1889
  5. Ashbey v. AshbeySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Douglas v. HaroSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
  2. Horn v. Skelly Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
  3. Bologna Bros. v. StephensSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
  4. Sanders v. FlowersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
  5. Sanders De Hart v. Continental Land Fur Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1944

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API