Legal Opinion
Douglas v. Haro
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided February 14, 1949No. 38843PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PONDER, Justice.
This case comes to us on review from the Court of Appeals for the Parish of Orleans. The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the trial court sustaining exceptions of no right and no cause of action on the ground that the plaintiff’s petition did not disclose an interest to prosecute the action and dismissed the plaintiff’s suit.
The plaintiff brought an action in ex delicto against the defendant, Julian L. Haro. It is alleged in the plaintiff’s petition that he owns and operates a garage for the purpose of parking and storing automobiles for a stipulated consideration;…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Reeves v. Globe Indemnity Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
- Succession of ToddSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
- De Hart v. Continental Land & Fur Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
- Bologna Bros. v. StephensSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
3Cited by39 opinions
- Giron v. Housing Auth. of City of OpelousasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
- Breaux v. Pan American Petroleum CorporationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
- Horn v. Skelly Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
- Standard Motor Car Co. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
- Sanders v. FlowersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.