City of Rio Rancho v. Logan
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CASTILLO, Judge.
{1} Plaintiff appeals the district court’s dismissal of the complaint against Defendant, the owner of two telecommunications towers that Plaintiff alleges are public nuisances. In response to Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, Defendant argued that the towers had been grandfathered in as legally permitted non-conforming uses under a 2004 city ordinance. The district court agreed with Defendant’s interpretation of the ordinance and, as there were no material issues of fact in dispute, dismissed Plaintiffs complaint. We reverse the district court.
I. BACKGROUND
{2}…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Helman v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- High Ridge Hinkle Joint Venture v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- Rio Grande Chapter of the Sierra Club v. New Mexico Mining CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
- Regents of the University of New Mexico v. New Mexico Federation of TeachersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- State Ex Rel. Klineline v. BlackhurstNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fowler Brothers, Inc. v. BoundsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
- Nelson v. HOMIER DISTRIBUTING CO., INC.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs v. Granite Hangar Dev. Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014