In re Cassidy
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
The Committee on Character and Fitness of the Second Judicial District, by a divided vote of five to two, have certified that in their opinion the above-named applicant possesses the necessary character and fitness to become a member of the Bar of this State and have recommended that he be admitted.
The members of the Committee reached their conclusions after devoting many days to hearing the testimony pro and con and many more days to the consideration of the voluminous papers presented. The record discloses the great length of time spent by them. The individual reports of the Committee…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Baumgartner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Presser v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Hamilton v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Matter of RoussNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Konigsberg v. State Bar of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Parker v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Law Students Civil Rights Research Council, Inc. v. WadmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Law Students Civil Rights Research Council, Inc. v. WadmondDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Application of TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.